Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-517 - Howard v. Montgomery County et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-517 - Howard v. Montgomery County et al
May 22, 2017
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO CLARIFY; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - To clarify the record, there are no John or Jane Does presently named as Defendants and the Summonses purportedly served on them are QUASHED. It is respectfully recommended that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 and it should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on that basis. Objections to R&R due by 6/5/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 5/22/2017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)