Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

04-5080 - FERAROLIS v. INTERNATIONAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
04-5080 - FERAROLIS v. INTERNATIONAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. et al
October 14, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER AND OPINION THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE FULL AND COMPLETE RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 10/14/05. 10/14/05 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED.(fdc)
November 29, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER AND OPINION THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: THE MOTION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT I HAVE RULED THAT THE PENNSYLVANIA WAGE PAYMENT AND COLLECTION LAW APPLIES IN THIS ACTION; THE MOTION IS OTHERWISE DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 11/29/05. 11/30/05 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(fdc)
February 2, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER AND OPINION THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EXTRANEOUS AND IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN THAT DEFENDANTS ARE PROHIBITED FROM INTRODUCING AT TRIAL ANY EVIDENCE, OR MAKING ANY REFERENCE, TO FERAROLIS'S 1995 DRUG CHARGES AND PROBATION. THE MOTION IS OTHERWISE DENIED; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT FERAROLIS'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO STRIKE OPINIONS, TESTIMONY AND REPORT OF PHILIP E. HUGHES, FILED IN THIS MATTER AS DOCUMENT 37 IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS ARE PROHIBITED FROM INTRODUCING AT TRIAL THE TESTIMONY, OPINIONS AND REPORT OF PHILIP E. HUGHES, OR FROM MAKING ANY REFERENCE TO THEM. SIGNED BY JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 2/2/06. 2/2/06 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(fdc, )
May 18, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER AND OPINION THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT OR FOR A PARTIAL NEW TRIAL IS DENIED; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL ON DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS, THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 5/17/06. 5/18/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fdc)