Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-1103 - COMAPER CORPORATION v. ANTEC, INC. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-1103 - COMAPER CORPORATION v. ANTEC, INC. et al
September 19, 2006
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT THE DISPUTED TERMS HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS: "CASE" SHALL MEAN A STRUCTURE FOR CONTAINING AND HOLDING SOMETHING; "DRIVE BAY SLOT" SHALL MEAN THE RELATIVELY NARROW OPENING IN THE HOUSING OF THE COMPUTER THAT LEADS TO THE DRIVE BAY; "SECOND OPENING" SHALL MEAN A SEPERATE OPENING THAT IS EXPOSED TO THE DRIVE BAY REGION; CASE OCCUPIES SUBSTANTIALLY THE ENTIRE DRIVE BAY SLOT" SHALL MEAN WHEN INSTALLED, THE CASE OCCUPIES ALMOST ENTIRELY THE SLOT LEADING TO THE DRIVE BAY. IGNED BY JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/19/06. 9/20/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jpd)
September 27, 2007
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION THAT ANTEC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NONINFRINGEMENT (DOC. NO. 51) IS DENIED. COMPAR'S MOTINO FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT (DOC. NO. 53) IS DENIED. ANTEC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON INVALIDITY DUE TO OBVIOUSNESS (DOC. NO.52) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/27/07. 9/27/07 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED (jpd)
September 8, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (DOC. NO. 106) IS GRANTED, DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL (DOC. NO. 107) ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDAT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/8/08. 9/8/08 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd)