Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-7509 - ACCURSO v. INFRA-RED SERVICES, INC. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-7509 - ACCURSO v. INFRA-RED SERVICES, INC. et al
May 28, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/28/2014. 5/29/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
May 28, 2014
PDF | More
ORDERED THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IS GRANTED. THE JOINT MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART WITH RESPECT O THE FOLLOWING COUNTS OF MR. ACCURSO'S AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/28/2014. 5/29/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
August 10, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION SETTING FORTH THE REASONS WHY THE COURT IS GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 68). AN APPROPRIATE ORDER FOLLOWS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 8/10/15. 8/10/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
August 10, 2015
PDF | More
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NUMBER 68) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 8/10/15. 8/10/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
March 11, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION SETTING FORTH THE COURT'S FINDINGS WITH REGARD TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE (DOCKET NOS 91 AND 92). AN APPROPRIATE ORDER FOLLOWS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/11/16. 3/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
March 11, 2016
PDF | More
ORDERED THAT MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 91 AND 92 ARE RULED ON ACCORDINGLY AS SET FORTH IN THE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/11/16. 3/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
April 1, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION SETTING FORTH THE REASONS WHY THE COURT IS DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' IN LIMINE MOTIONS (DOCKET NO. 119). AN APPROPRIATE ORDER FOLLOWS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 4/1/16. 4/1/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
April 1, 2016
PDF | More
Ordered THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE (DOCKET NO. 119) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS SET FORTH IN THE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 4/1/16. 41/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
February 16, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION SETTING FORTH THE COURT'S REASONS AND RULINGS ON THE OUTSTANDING MOTIONS. AN APPROPRIATE ORDER FOLLOWS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 2/15/18. 2/16/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
February 16, 2018
PDF | More
ORDERED THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT PETER ACCURSO TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 140) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS INFRA-RED SERVICES, INC., ROOFING DYNAMICS GROUP, LLC, ROOFING DYNAMICS, INC., BRIAN LAND, AND AUDREY STREIN FOR POST TRIAL RELIEF (DOCKET NO. 143) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT PETER ACCURSO FOR ATTORNEY FEES, LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, COSTS AND PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST (DOCKET NO. 144) IS DENIED. THE AMENDED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT PETER ACCURSO FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER O LAW, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A NEW TRIAL AND/OR TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 164) IS DENIED. THE AMENDED MOTION OF DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS INFRA-RED SERVICES, INC., ROOFING DYNAMICS GROUP, LLC, ROOFING DYNAMICS, INC., BRIAN LAND, AND AUDREY STREIN PURSUANT TO RULE 50(b) FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON PLAINTIFF'S PA AGE [SIC] PAYMENT AND COLLECTION LAW CLAIM (DOCKET NO. 165) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE AMENDED POST-TRIAL MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS INFRA-RED SERVICES, INC., ROOFING DYNAMICS GROUP, LLC, ROOFING DYNAMICS, INC., BRIAN LAND, AND AUDREY STREIN (DOCKET NO. 166) ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE AMENDED POST-TRIAL MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS INFRA-RED SERVICES, INC., ROOFING DYNAMICS GROUP, LLC, ROOFING DYNAMICS, INC., BRIAN LAND, AND AUDREY STREIN PURSUANT TO RULES 54, 59 AND 60(DOCKET NO. 171) IS DENIED. THE AMENDED POST-TRIAL MOTION OF DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTFFS INFRA-RED SERVICES, INC., ROOFING SYNAMICS GROUP, LLC, ROOFING DYNAMICS, INC., BRIAN LAND, AND AUDREY STREIN PURSUANT TO RULE 50(B) FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON PLAINTIF'S PA AGE [sic] PAYMENT AND COLLECTION LAW CLAIM (DOCKET NO. 172) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 2/15/18. 2/16/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )