Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-159 - GREEN v. BURKHART et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-159 - GREEN v. BURKHART et al
August 11, 2016
PDF | More
aggerty on the retaliation claim based on Plaintiffs placement in the RHU on administrative custody status beginning on February 3, 2014; - Summary judgment should be granted in favor of Defendants Chiles, Ennis, and Haggerty on the retaliation claim based on their confiscation of several personal photographs from Plaintiffs cell; - Summary judgment should be granted in favor of Defendants Chiles and Gilara as to the retaliation claim based on the removal of Plaintiffs job duties; - Summary judgment should be granted in favor of Defendant Gilara on the retaliation claim based on verbal threats he made to Plaintiff; - Summary judgment should be granted in favor of Haggerty, Ennis, Horton, Cole and Oberlander on the retaliation claim arising out of the denial of a prompt PRC hearing; - Summary judgment should be granted in favor of Haggerty on the retaliation claim arising out of Plaintiffs placement in the RHU rather than the infirmary following the May 6th assault; - Summary judgment should be denied on the retaliation claim against Murin and Zimmer for refusal to provide Plaintiff with copies of request slips; - Summary judgment should be denied on the retaliation claim against Overmyer, Crowthers, and Chiles based on the denial of a promotional transfer; - Summary judgment should be granted in favor of Defendant Siegel on the retaliation claim based on the destruction of Plaintiffs boots; - Summary judgment should be granted in favor of Haggerty, Burkhart, Gilara, Murin and Zimmer on Plaintiffs state law negligence claims arising out of the destruction of personal property; and- Plaintiff should not be permitted to further amend his complaint to add Sible and Dunlap as Defendants or to expand on the personal involvement of Siegel in the destruction of his boots. It is further recommended that the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Abraham 101 should be granted. Defendant Abraham should be dismissed as a party to this litigation. Objections to R&R due by 8/29/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 8/11/16. (lrw)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the motion for partial summary judgment filed by the Department of Corrections Defendants 96 be granted in part and denied in part, in the following manner: - Summary judgment should be granted in favor of Defendant H
September 27, 2016
PDF | More
Abraham 101 should be granted. Authorized by Judge Barbara Rothstein on 9/26/2016. (sgg) Modified on 9/28/2016. (dm)ORDER adopting 122 Report and Recommendation recommending that the motion for partial summary judgment filed by the Department of Corrections Defendants 96 be granted in part and denied in part and motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant
June 29, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER Re: DENYING Defendants' Objections Filed at Doc. Nos. 186 and 194, and DENYING Plaintiff's Motions for Reconsideration Filed at Doc. Nos. 196 and 197, and DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time Filed at Doc. No. 195. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 6/29/17. (eet)
July 5, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 187 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 189 Motion in Limine. The Parties shall file a revised Joint Exhibit List on ECF in accordance with these rulings, and Defendants shall deliver copies of the exhibits in three (3) binders (one each for the Court, Court Reporter, and the Jury) to Chambers by Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 12:00 PM (noon). Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 7/5/2017. (eet)
July 7, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING 204 Motion for Reconsideration; DENYING 211 Motion for Clarification. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 7/7/2017. (eet)
July 7, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 206 Plaintiff's Motion to Deem Claims Against John Doe/Miller as Admitted. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 7/7/2017. (eet)
July 7, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 212 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 7/7/2017. (eet)
July 14, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER re: Voir Dire, Final Jury Instructions, and Verdict Form. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 7/14/2017. (eet)
October 4, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying 239 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 10/4/2017. (lmt)