Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-1331 - JORDAN v. MEL BLOUNT YOUTH HOME OF PENNSYLVANIA et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-1331 - JORDAN v. MEL BLOUNT YOUTH HOME OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
April 4, 2006
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by MEL BLOUNT YOUTH HOME OF PENNSYLVANIA,MEL BLOUNT,TIANDA BLOUNT,CAROL LOCKETT. Objections to R&R due by 4/21/2006. Signed by Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 04/04/06. (jer, )
May 26, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss, adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's request for punitive damages under the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law, 43 Pa.C.S.A.Section 1421. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claims against the individual Defendants contained in Count III. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED in all other respects. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated April 4, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the court. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 5/26/06. (smc)
April 8, 2008
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by TIANDA BLOUNT, MEL BLOUNT, MEL BLOUNT YOUTH HOME OF PENNSYLVANIA, CAROL LOCKETT. Objections to R&R due by 4/25/2008. Signed by Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 04/08/08. (jer)
June 16, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 54 Report and Recommendations. After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the R&R, defendants' objections and plaintiff's response, the following Order is entered: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 40) be granted with respect to plaintiff's claims for (a) violation of the Equal Protection Act of 1963; (b) subjection to a hostile work environment; (c) reverse race discrimination and/or retaliation; and (d) age discrimination and/or retaliation, and that the motion be denied in its remaining respects. The R&R of Magistrate Judge Lenihan is adopted as the opinion of the court, except that references to "Defendant" shall be revised to read "Defendants" when the context requires. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 6/16/08. (smc)