Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

06-200 - HOWARD v. RUSTIN et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
06-200 - HOWARD v. RUSTIN et al
September 24, 2007
PDF | More
moot 71 Motion to Compel without prejudice and with leave to re-file if necessary (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/24/07.(jg)MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion to Compel. The Court grants the motion to the extent that the Plaintiffs seek an order compelling Ms. Stack to respond to questions regarding the refusal of treatment and orders Ms. Stack to answer the disputed question in compliance with this Memorandum Order. The Court denies as moot the motion to the extent that the Plaintiffs seek an order compelling the production of healthcare treatment policies and procedures; denying as
April 30, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that, for the reasons said more fully in said Order, (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Bruce Dixon M.D. to Answer Questions at Deposition Upon Oral Examination 86 is granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants the same to the extent that it seeks Dr. Dixon to re-appear for deposition and answer counsel for Plaintiff's question whether he made any request of the Allegheny County legal department regarding the release of information about infectious diseases and HIPAA. The Court denies the same in all other respects; (2) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Michael Patterson Sr., M.D. to Answer Questions at Deposition Upon Oral Examination 88 is granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants the same to the extent it seeks Dr. Patterson to re-appear for deposition and answer counsel for Plaintiffs question regarding whether he investigated the medical care given to Ms. Sartori. The Court denies the same in all other respects; (3) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Lucille Aiken, M.D. to Answer Questions at Deposition Upon Oral Examination 89 (Errata of Document 87) is granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants the same to the extent it seeks Dr. Aiken to re-appear for deposition and answer counsel for Plaintiffs' questions regarding Dr. Aikens opinion as to the amount of staffing as well as to the lack of entries on Ms. Sartoris chart for a two hour period. The Court denies the same in all other respects; As to all the above motions, the Court denies Plaintiffs' requests for costs related to the same. The Court also orders that the above depositions be scheduled and concluded by May 30, 2008. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 4/30/08. (jg)
May 2, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 91 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Directed to Defendant Allegheny County Correction Health Services, Inc., Bruce Dixon and Dana Phillips; details more fully stated in said Order. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/2/08. (jg)