Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

06-937 - MILLER v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER, MCKEESPORT


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
06-937 - MILLER v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER, MCKEESPORT
July 10, 2008
PDF | More
ns of the PMWA and WPCL and, therefore, defendant's motion will be DENIED with respect to those claims. Plaintiff, however, did not adduce sufficient evidence for a reasonable fact-finder to render a verdict in favor of plaintiff on her claims under the ADA, PHRA, FMLA, or FLSA and summary judgment will be GRANTED in favor of defendant on those claims. Although this court has the power to hear pendent state claims following dismissal of federal claims, the court also has the discretion to refuse to hear the state claim. Because the court dismissed all of the federal claims over which it has jurisdiction in this case, the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state claims. The state claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/10/2008. (amj) Modified on 7/10/2008 to correct typo. (amj )MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. After considering the undisputed material facts of record, viewing all disputed facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, the motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 31) filed by defendant UPMC McKeesport, improperly named in the caption, will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court concludes that plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence with respect to her claims for violatio