Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

08-611 - TAYLOR et al v. PILEWSKI et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
08-611 - TAYLOR et al v. PILEWSKI et al
September 8, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss, as follows: the individual capacity claims against Defendant Rustin are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Rustin's request for dismissal based on qualified immunity is DENIED as premature; the claims against Allegheny County are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and Plaintiff Terri Taylor is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this lawsuit. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 19, 2008, Plaintiff shall amend his Complaint as discussed herein or face the dismissal of his claims against the County and Warden with prejudice. Having been placed on notice of the deficiencies in his pleadings, Plaintiff will enjoy no further opportunity for amendment. Once Plaintiff has amended his Complaint, Defendants shall plead or otherwise respond to the amended pleadings in conformity with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 9/8/08. (dcd)
November 7, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting 28 Allegheny County and Ramon C. Rustin's Motion to Dismiss; these Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/7/08. (dcd)
December 10, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER re 34 Order directing Plaintiff to secure new counsel or file notice of his intent to proceed pro se. By 12/22/08, Plaintiff shall either: (a) secure the entry of appearance of new legal counsel, or (b) file a notice with the Court indicating Plaintiff's intent to proceed pro se. Should Plaintiff fail to comply, or by that date show good cause for his lack of compliance, his case will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/10/08. (dcd)
December 23, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Plaintiff was advised that, should he fail by December 22, 2008 to either secure the entry of appearance of new legal counsel or notify the Court of his intention to proceed pro se, his case would be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's directives and, consequently, his case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/23/08. (dcd)