Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

09-093 - USA v. BARFIELD

Download Files


Document in Context
09-093 - USA v. BARFIELD
February 4, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER indicating that upon consideration of Defendant Dirk Barkfield, Jr.'s pro se Petition (Docket No. 38), wherein he seeks a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the "Supplement to Pro Se Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Motion and Brief in Support of Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B)," filed by by court-appointed counsel Michael J. Novara, First Assistant Public Defender, on Defendant's behalf (Docket No. 43), and the "Governments Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and § 3582(c)(1)(B)," it is hereby ordered that, for the reasons more fully stated wihtin, Defendant's Motion 38 is denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/4/13. (jg)
February 28, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION as to DIRK LANIEL BARFIELD, JR. indicating that, based upon the reasons stated within, Defendant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 66 is denied, with prejudice. The Court also holds that Defendant has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a Constitutional right and is not entitled to a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.§ 2253(c)(2). An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/28/17. (jg)