Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-595 - BOATNER v. SALEM et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-595 - BOATNER v. SALEM et al
July 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER OF COURT RE: 14 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION TO DISTRICT COURT. Pro Se Plaintiff's requested relief is DENIED. Mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff this same day. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 07/16/2015. (lcb)
December 18, 2015
PDF | More
ed that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Jason DiMucchio (ECF No. 38) be granted. It is further recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Police Defendants John Melnik, Robert Piche, Robert Salem, Corporal SeeREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 50 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ROBERT SALEM, JOHN MELNICK, AMANDA VENTURA, ROBERT PICHE, JUSTIN WARREN, CORPORAL SEELBAUGH, and 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by JASON DIMUCCHIO. It is recommendlbaugh, Amanda Ventura, and Justin Warren (ECF No. 50) be denied without prejudice, and that the civil action be stayed and administratively closed until the underlying criminal action against Plaintiff in the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County is concluded. Thereafter, the Police Defendants may move to reopen the case and re-file their Motion for Summary Judgment. Objections to R&R due by 1/4/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 12/18/2015. (vad)
January 6, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 66 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court re 65 Report and Recommendation 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. The 38 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Jason DiMucchio is GRANTED and that the 50 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Police Defendants John Melnik, Robert Piche, Robert Salem, Corporal Seelbaugh, Amanda Ventura, and Justin Warren is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The civil action is stayed and administratively closed until the underlying criminal action against Plaintiff in the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County (and any related appeal) is concluded. Thereafter, Plaintiff may move to reopen the case for good cause shown, and, if the case is reopened, the Police Defendants may re-file their Motion for Summary Judgment. The 65 R&R of Magistrate Judge Lenihan dated 12/18/2015, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 1/6/2016. (eet) Modified docket text on 2/1/2016. (tt)