Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1654 - YOUNG v. FARLEY et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1654 - YOUNG v. FARLEY et al
March 21, 2016
PDF | More
s no later than 4/18/16, and failure to supply those copies may result in the dismissal of the Complaint for failure to obey Court Orders and/or to prosecute. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/21/16. (jg)MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that that the Plaintiff's Request for Allowance to File a Single and/or only one (1) copy of support documents handwritten 6 is granted in part and denied in part; Plaintiff shall file actual photocopies of those supporting documents and may not substitute for those copies handwritten transcriptions of those documents; Plaintiff is permitted to file only one copy of supporting documents and will not need to serve counsel with same because the filing of the document on ECF will be considered adequate service for all filings other than original process; and Plaintiff shall supply a sufficient number of copies of the complaint and service papers for each named defendant; that Plaintiff's Motion to Waive Local Rule 7 is denied; that Plaintiff Motion for leave to file single copies (which was docketed as a "Motion to File Objections") 9 seeking to file single copies of: Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, supporting documents, and Motion for Leave to Amend is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Plaintiffs Motion is granted to the extent that he seeks leave to file single copies of his objections, single copies of his declaration in support, single copies of supporting documents, other than documents purporting to be handwritten versions or transcribed copies of exhibits rather than photocopies of those exhibits, and single copies of his motion to request leave to amend, and is denied to the extent that he seeks leave to file handwritten versions or transcribed copies of his exhibits rather than photocopies of those exhibits; that ruling on the Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint 10, and ruling on Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation 8) are deferred until after Plaintiff supplies photocopies to this Court of all paperwork associated with Grievance Nos. 517950 and 517973; and that Plaintiff shall supply those photocopie
March 14, 2017
PDF | More
be mailed this day, 3/14/17, to Plaintiff at his address of record. (ard)ORDER denying 56 Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order and denying 61 Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 3/14/17. A copy of this Order will
October 23, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 77 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by SENTZ, LAMONACA, GEPPERT, FARLEY, recommending that the Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2017. Objections to R&R for Unregistered ECF Users due by 11/9/2017. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/23/17. A copy of this Report and Recommendation as well as the docket entry reflecting the due date for Objections will be mailed to Plaintiff this day, 10/23/17, at his address of record. (ard)
December 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER indicating that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 95 is adopted as the opinion of this Court; that the Motion for Summary Judgment 77 granted; that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order, a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within 30 days. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/21/17. (jg)