Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1182 - SLOAN v. THOMPSON et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1182 - SLOAN v. THOMPSON et al
August 16, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 42 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed by The Medical Defendants and 39 the MOTION TO DISMISS Amended Complaint filed by the DOC Defendants. For the reasons explained in the report and recommendation, it is respectfully submitted that both motions be granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' written objections, if any, to R&R due by 8/31/2017. Plaintiff's written objections, if any, to R&R due by 9/5/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 08/16/2017. (bsc)
September 7, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that the Report and Recommendation 54 of Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy is hereby adopted as the opinion of the district court; that the DOC Defendants' motion to dismiss 39 is granted, in part, and denied, in part. The DOC Defendants' motion 39 is granted to the extent that: 1. All claims against SCI-Mercer and the Department of Corrections are dismissed with prejudice; 2. The Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Thompson, Woods, and Sullenberger are dismissed with prejudice; The DOC Defendants' motion 39 is denied to the extent that:1. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Bromley, Boggs, and Dellorso shall proceed to discovery; 2. Plaintiff's retaliation claims against Engstrom, Thompson, Bromley, Boggs, and Dellorso shall proceed to discovery; that the Medical Defendants' motion to dismiss 42 is granted, in part, and denied, in part. The Medical Defendants' motion 42 is granted to the extent that: 1. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claims are dismissed, with prejudice, and leave to amend such claims is denied; 2. Plaintiff's Monell claim against Correct Care Solutions is dismissed, without prejudice, and he is granted leave to amend his Monell claim but only to the extent that he can allege sufficient facts to allow the Court to conclude that his treatment, or lack thereof, was part of a pervasive corporate policy or custom, including a failure to train, which directly caused the constitutional violations about which he complains; The Medical Defendants' motion 42 is denied to the extent that: 1. Defendants' claims of res judicata are denied, without prejudice; 2. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Morgan, Feathers and Ellers shall proceed to discovery; that this matter is hereby remanded to Magistrate Judge Eddy to conduct further proceedings and issue appropriate Orders. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/7/17. (jg)
March 27, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER denying 82 Plaintiff's Motion to waive the requirement or necessity for a certificate of merit; and denying without prejudice 85 the Medical Defendants' Motion to Strike. See Memorandum Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 3/27/2018. (bsc)