Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1191 - INGRAM v. MILLER et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1191 - INGRAM v. MILLER et al
May 22, 2018
PDF | More
non-electronically registered party may file written objections to R&R by 6/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/22/2018. (bsc)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by STEVEN INGRAM, and 104 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by J. LANE, N. MILLER. It is respectfully recommended that the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment be denied as genuine issues of material fact exist which preclude the granting of summary judgment. Defendants, because they are electronically registered parties may file written objections to R&R by 6/5/2018. Plaintiff, because he is a
July 10, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 97 and 104 Motions for Summary Judgment and adopting 129 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy as the Opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 7/9/18. (njt)