Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

08-2652 - Hill v. C R Bard Inc et al

Download Files


Document in Context
08-2652 - Hill v. C R Bard Inc et al
August 26, 2008
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Entered by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal on 8/26/08. For the reasons set forth above, this Court recommends that Plaintiffs Motion To Remand (#4) be GRANTED and that the case be remanded to the Circuit Court of Champaign County. The parties are advised that any objection to this recommendation must be filed in writing with the clerk within ten (10) working days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Failure to object will constitute a waiver ofobjection on appeal. Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). See written Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2008. (KW, ilcd)
October 15, 2008
PDF | More
OPINION Entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 10/15/08. (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 4 is DENIED.(2) Defendant Rohrscheib's Motion to Dismiss Count 3 of Amended Complaint 9 and Defendant Lo's Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of Amended Complaint 17 are GRANTED. (3) Counts 2 and 3 of the Amended Complaint are Dismissed with prejudice. (4) Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Medical Certificate 19 is DENIED.(5) The case is referred to Magistrate Judge David Bernthal for further proceedings in accordance with this Opinion. See written opinion. (KW, ilcd)