Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

14-126 - L.H. et al v. Hamilton County Department of Education

Download Files


Document in Context
14-126 - L.H. et al v. Hamilton County Department of Education
March 11, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER: Pending before the Court is the defendant's motion to transfer to more appropriate venue 2, to which no response has been filed. Failure to file a response indicates that there is no opposition to the motion. As a result, the initial case management conference scheduled on 4/7/2014, is CANCELLED, and the Clerk is directed to forward the file in this case to the Honorable John T. Nixon for his consideration of the defendant's unopposed motion to transfer venue. Unless otherwise directed by the Court or upon motion of the parties, there will be no further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 3/11/14. (dt) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 4/21/2014.]
November 24, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER granting 15 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint.Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file their amended complaint within 7 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 11/24/2014. (SAC, )
April 27, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM- the Court will DENY Defendants motions to dismiss (Court FileNos. 34, 37). Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 4/27/2015. (CNC, )
November 13, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 86 MOTION for Hearing on Minor Settlement filed by G. H., D. H., L. H. I also FIND the settlement is in the best interest of Minor Plaintiff and I RECOMMEND that the settlement between Plaintiffs and Defendant be APPROVED and that the parties joint motion 86 be GRANTED.Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 11/13/2015. (SAC, )
December 11, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER granting 86 Motion for Hearing; adopting Report and Recommendations re 112 Report and Recommendations and APPROVES the settlement agreement. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 12/11/2015. (SAC, )
November 4, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM. The Court concludes Plaintiffs have established by apreponderance of the evidence that the placement proposed in L.H.s 20132014 was not L.H.s least-restrictive environment. Because the private placement chosen by L.H.s parents lacks several critical qualities necessary for L.H. to receive an educational benefit, however, the Court concludes Plaintiffs are not entitled to reimbursement for the costs associated with theplacement. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 11/4/2016. (BDG, )