Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

07-198 - Harris v. Mills

Download Files


Document in Context
07-198 - Harris v. Mills
September 24, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons stated, petitioner does not qualify for a stay and abatement order and, therefore, his motion to hold his case in abeyance 10 will be DENIED. Respondent's motion to dismiss 7 will be GRANTED, and this petition will be DISMISSED. The Court now finds that reasonable jurists could not disagree with the resolution of these claims and could not conclude that they are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003), and will DENY issuance of a COA. 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). A separate order will enter. C/M to Pro Se Petitioner. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 9/24/2008. (FMM ).