Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

10-116 - USA v. Barnett

Download Files


Document in Context
10-116 - USA v. Barnett
January 13, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Everette S Barnett. The petitioner's motion for a scheduling order [Doc. 105] is GRANTED to the extent he seeks an adjudication of his motions but is otherwise DENIED. For the reasons set forth above, the Court holds that neither petitioner's prosecution in this court nor his sentencing was in violation of the constitution or laws of the United States and he is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing. His motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255, Docs. [88, 96], is DENIED. Because petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 01/13/2017. (C/M to pro se filer) (AMP) Modified as to C/M on 1/13/2017 (AMP).