Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-022 - USA v. Lowe


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-022 - USA v. Lowe
May 9, 2005
PDF | More
PRETRIAL ORDER as to Carlos Clifford Lowe with jury trial before Honorable Thomas A. Varlan on 6/16/05 9:00 AM. Signed by Judge C Clifford Shirley on May 9, 2005. (CRS)
May 27, 2005
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER as to Carlos Clifford Lowe:GRANTING 14 MOTION to Substitute Attorney filed by Carlos Clifford Lowe. Added attorney Joseph A Baker for Carlos Clifford Lowe. Attorney Elizabeth Barger Ford terminated in case as to Carlos Clifford Lowe. Signed by Judge C Clifford Shirley on 05/27/05. (JDH)
September 27, 2011
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION as to Carlos Clifford Lowe re 40 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on September 26, 2011. (JAN, )
September 27, 2011
PDF | More
JUDGMENT ORDER as to Carlos Clifford Lowe DENYING 40 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by Carlos Clifford Lowe and this action is DISMISSED. Should the petitioner give timely notice of an appeal from this decision, such notice will be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, which under the circumstances is DENIED. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. Therefore, this Court hereby DENIES the petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on September 26, 2011. (JAN, )(cm: deft)
April 12, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION as to Carlos Clifford Lowe re Petitioners successive pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Docs. 52. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on April 12, 2017. (JAN, )(cm)
April 12, 2017
PDF | More
JUDGMENT ORDER as to Carlos Clifford Lowe: For the reasons expressed in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Petitioners successive pro se § 2255 motion Doc. 52 is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. If Petitioner files a notice of appeal from this judgment, such notice of appeal will be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, which is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) because he has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24 that any such appeal from this judgment would be frivolous and not taken in good faith.. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on April 12, 2017. (JAN, )(CM)