Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-203 - Lick Branch Unit, LLC et al v. Reed et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-203 - Lick Branch Unit, LLC et al v. Reed et al
June 21, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER holding in abeyance 9 Motion to Vacate; granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Maintain Status Quo. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 06/21/2013. (KAW)
February 10, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM: the Court will GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART Defendants' motions (Court File Nos. 26, 28). Specifically, the Court will DENY Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Court File No. 28). The Court will also DENY Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs civil RICO with respect to Jim Reed and James Lueking, tortious interference with a contract, conversion, nuisance, civil conspiracy, and slander of title claims (Court File No. 26). The Court will GRANT Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' civil RICO claim with respect to Charles Bruce Reed, tortious interference with business relations, abuse of process, interference with the Unit, and attorney's fees claims (Court File No. 26). An Order shall enter. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 2/10/2014. (BJL, )
November 3, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM: The Court finds Defendants own the working interest in the oil, gas, and minerals beneath Defendants' property because Plaintiffs' working interest reverted to Defendants via statute. The Court will therefore GRANT Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment 97 and DENY Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment 101.Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 11/3/2016. (aws, )