Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

13-687 - Venture Tech, Inc. v. The Hartz Mountain Corporation (PLR1)

Download Files


Document in Context
13-687 - Venture Tech, Inc. v. The Hartz Mountain Corporation (PLR1)
June 2, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 61 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Venture Tech, Inc. and 69 MOTION TO DISMISS PROCEEDING FOR ATTORNEYS FEES IN THIS COURT WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by The Graham Law Firm, PLLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 6/2/16. (JBR)
September 29, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; After a careful review of the record, the Court is in complete agreement with Magistrate Judge Guyton's recommendations 71. Accordingly, the court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation under 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Venture Tech's motion for sanctions 61 is GRANTED to the extent that GLF shall produce any additional documents as required by the subpoena duces tecum and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45 within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Venture Tech's motion for disgorgement of $17,460 in attorney fees paid to GLF is DENIED at this time. GLF's motion to dismiss proceeding for attorney's fees 69 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 9/29/16. (ADA)