Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-222 - Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Dees et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-222 - Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Dees et al
April 3, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: Now before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion for Deposition by Telephone 47. The Plaintiff requests that the Court allow it to take telephonic depositions in preparation of the default judgment damages hearing against Defendant Harry Dees, which is currently set for April 26, 2017. Because the deponents are located in different cities and the damages hearing is approximately three weeks away, the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs Motion for Deposition by Telephone 47. The Court will not, however, grant Plaintiff's blanket request for "other telephonic depositions that may become necessary and proper."Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 4/3/17. (ADA)
July 25, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Provectuss motion for default judgment (Doc. 21) will be GRANTED IN PART. An Appropriate Judgment Will Enter. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 7/24/2017. (AML, )