Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

17-189 - March v. Aramark Corporation et al

Download Files


Document in Context
17-189 - March v. Aramark Corporation et al
March 28, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to unseal qui tam action, to permit Plaintiff to proceed as qui tam Plaintiff, and to serve complaint [Doc. 12] is DENIED to the extent that Plaintiff will not proceed qui tam herein. Defendants Floss, Adams, Babbio, Abrecht, Mehra, Heinreich, Coleman, Sadove, Esteves, Beckers-Viajant, Siaccia, Quelch, Dreiling, CHS, TDOC, and Woodall are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's motion for status [Doc. 17] is GRANTED to the extent that this memorandum and order is being entered. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. 19] is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time [Doc. 23] is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 03/28/2018. (Copy of Memorandum & Order along with service packets mailed to Perry Avram March) (AMP)