Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-067 - McDougal et al v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-067 - McDougal et al v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
June 16, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER: For good cause shown, these applications DEs 2, 3, 4 are GRANTED. Because Plaintiff Andrew Helton did not submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or any portion of the filing fee, the claims asserted by him are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the filing fee will not be assessed against him. The Defendant TDOC is DISMISSED as an improper party for a Section 1983 action. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to ISSUE PROCESS to Defendants at the addresses indicated in the Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 6/16/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail; Warden of TCIC via reg mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
June 28, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons explained above, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' RLUIPA claim be DENIED and Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/28/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
July 29, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 187) is ADOPTED. Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 147) and Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 170) are DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/28/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)