Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-055 - Hancock et al v. Rowland et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-055 - Hancock et al v. Rowland et al
July 20, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/16/2015. (xc:Pro se parties by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) Modified text on 7/22/2015 (hb).
June 16, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pending before the Court is the Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff Ralston's complaint for failure to prosecute. (Docket Entry 34). For the following reasons, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Docket Entry 34) be GRANTED, that Plaintiff Ralston's claims against Defendants Rowland and Wagonschutz be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that any appeal of the dismissal NOT BE CERTIFIED as taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 6/16/16. (xc:Pro se parties by regular and certified mail-not mailed to Ralston-no longer incarcerated-no address on file.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af) Modified on 6/16/2016 (af).
July 15, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 45) to grant Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Docket Entry No. 34) and to dismiss Plaintiff Ralston's claims against Defendants with prejudice. Plaintiff Ralston has not filed an objection. After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Docket Entry No. 34) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Ralston's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Any appeal of this Order would not be in good faith as required by 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3). It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/14/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail - not mailed to Ralston-no longer incarcerated-no address on file.)(hb)
August 25, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants' motion to dismiss 58 be granted pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for Plaintiffs' failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/25/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
September 20, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 59), recommending to grant Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docket Entry Nos. 52 and 58) for Plaintiffs' failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Magistrate Judge's previous Order (Docket Entry No. 54). Plaintiffs have not filed an objection. After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docket Entry Nos. 52 and 58) are GRANTED. Defendants' motion to amend scheduling Order (Docket Entry No. 41) is DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. This is the Final Order in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 9/19/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) Modified text on 9/20/2016 (hb).