Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-090 - Carter v. Corrections Corporation of America et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-090 - Carter v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
November 12, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 11/12/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
March 17, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : The undersigned recommends that the instant Motion (Docket No. 7) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 3/17/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
May 5, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Accordingly, (1) the R & R (Docket No. 84) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiff's Objections (Docket No. 90) are OVERRULED; and (3) and Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 7) is hereby DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/5/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
August 29, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 62) should be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 8/29/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
September 26, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Defendants' partial motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 62) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Morgan and Jamerson are DISMISSED with prejudice, and these Defendants are DISMISSED from this action. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 9/26/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
January 13, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 1/12/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2017: # (1) Attachment Text Searchable) (eh).
January 13, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 121). Due to material factual disputes, the motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants Schofield, Parker, and Woodall (Docket Entry No. 80); Defendants CCA, Lindamood, Dodd, McClain, Cobble, Morgan, Buttram, and Jamerson (Docket Entry No. 95); and Plaintiff (Docket Entry No. 103) are DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 1/12/2017. (Attachments: # (1) Attachment Text Searchable)(xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)