Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-024 - Newberry v. Melton et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-024 - Newberry v. Melton et al
March 17, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to return the plaintiff's unsigned application to him. The plaintiff shall sign the application and resubmit it to the Clerks Office within fourteen (14) days of its receipt. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/17/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
January 31, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The undersigned finds that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether Plaintiff received any medical treatment during or for some of his seizures and/or resulting injuries. The undersigned therefore recommends that the Deck Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 44) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 1/31/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
February 8, 2017
PDF | More
t color=red>(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that the instant Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 46) be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 2/8/2017.
March 31, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: Having undertaken a review of this matter in accordance with Rule 72, the Court exercises its discretion to return this matter to the magistrate judge. It is unclear to the Court upon whose declarations and depositions, and upon what specifically in those declarations and depositions, Magistrate Judge Frensley relied when determining that there exist genuine issues of material fact as to each of the Deck Defendants. Therefore, the Court requests Magistrate Judge Frensley to clarify and reissue an R & R. Accordingly, the R & R (Docket No. 82) is hereby DENIED to allow Magistrate Judge Frensley to issue a new one. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/31/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
April 4, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 83) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 46 as to Defendants Phillips, Harvey, and Melton in their official capacities is GRANTED; (3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Phillips, Harvey, and Melton in their individual capacities is DENIED; and (4) Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment Claims are DISMISSED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/4/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
April 6, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint: As of the date of the filing of this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's previous Order. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that Defendant Overton County, Tennessee be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 4/6/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
April 26, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : For the reasons discussed above, the undersigned recommends that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 44) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 4/26/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)