Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

06-073 - Wilson v. State of Tennessee et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
06-073 - Wilson v. State of Tennessee et al
July 25, 2006
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that process issue to deft State of TN, but that all claims against defts Walton Moore, Pamela Bullard, the Dept of Finance and Administration and the Bureau of TennCare be dismissed. As some of pltf's claims warrant dismissal under 28 USC, Section 1915(e)(2), the Court recommends that any appeal taken of this Report and Recommendation, if adopted by the Court, would not be in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 8/8/2006. Signed by Judge Juliet Griffin on 7/25/06. (gi, )
August 30, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER accepting 4 Report and Recommendation. Defts Walton Moore, Pamela Bullard, the Department of Finance and Administration and the Bureau of TennCare are dismissed. Process shall issue to the Deft State of TN. Any appeal of the dismissal of the defts would not be in good faith. Case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial management. Signed by Judge Robert Echols on 8/30/06. (gi, )
September 5, 2007
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court respectfully recommends that 10 Deft's Motion to Dismiss be denied. Signed by Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 9/5/07. (cc: pltf by certified and regular mail) (jb)
September 26, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER: The 33 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. 10 Deft's Motion to Dismiss is denied. This case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01. Signed by Judge Robert Echols on 9/25/07. (jb)
April 17, 2008
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that 37 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/17/08. (gi)
July 30, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER adopting Report And Recommendations. The R&R thoroughly examines each claim and explains why the record shows that there are no material issues of fact and why the Deft is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Court identifies no error of fact or law in the R&R. Accordingly, (1) the R&R of the Magistrate Judge 43 is hereby ACCEPTED; (2) the Deft's Motion for Summary Judgment 37 is hereby GRANTED; and (3) this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 7/30/08. (tmw)