Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-867 - Freeman v. Gay et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-867 - Freeman v. Gay et al
June 7, 2012
PDF | More
CE; defts Washburn and Stinson's 61 motion to dismiss be GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART; the claims against defts Riker and Morin be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; deft Nurse Litishal be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and the Court DECLINE to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims asserted in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/7/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(rd) Modified on 6/8/2012 (af). Modified on 7/2/2012 (rd).61], 92, 94, 97, 112 motions to dismiss be GRANTED and defts Cooper, Taft, Gay, Preston, James, Daniel, Graves, Franklin, Hughes, Hunter, Moore, Rasnick, Troutt, Weatherford, Whitley, Martin, Ford, Harris and Steakin be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDIREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS: pltf's 8 motions to amend be DENIED; pltf's 13 motion for review be DENIED; pltf's 77 motion for injunctive relief be DENIED; defts' 17, 22, 31, 33, 56, [
September 28, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 120 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and APPROVED; pltf's 130, 134 amended motions in objection are OVERRULED; pltf's 8 motions to amend are DENIED; pltf's 13 motion for review is DENIED; pltf's 77 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED; defts' 17, 22, 31, 33, 56, 61, 92, 94, 97, 112 motions to dismiss are GRANTED, and defts Cooper, Taft, Gay, Preston, James, Daniel, Graves, Franklin, Hughes, Hunter, Moore, Rasnick, Troutt, Weatherford, Whitley, Martin, Ford, Harris, and Steakin are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; the 61 motion to dismiss of defts Washburn and Stinson is GRANTED as to the official capacity claims, and any state law claims, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, but is DENIED as to claims against these defts in their individual capacities; these claims are STAYED until the conclusion of the state proceedings; defts Riker and Morin are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted; deft Nurse Litisha is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to be servied with process; the Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims; pltf's 128 motion to respond is DENIED AS MOOT; pltf's 135 motion for review in part and motion to respond in part is DENIED; pltf's 151 motion to appoint counsel is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/28/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(rd)
February 10, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER: Accordingly, the STAY in this action remains in effect. By March 3, 2014, the Defendants shall file a status report, including the status of the relevant state proceedings, the resolution of the state charges, whether further proceedings are scheduled, and the status of any appeals that have been filed. Motion to Respond and opportunity to amend 198 is DENIED. Three other motions 164, 165, 172 are reserved for a ruling by the Honorable Kevin H. Sharp, the District Judge assigned to the action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 2/10/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail only.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
August 7, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER: By October 1, 2014, defendants Stinson and Washburn shall file another status report, indicating the status of the plaintiff's appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 8/7/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 31, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the forgoing, the Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion for summary judgment of Defendant Jack Babbitt (Docket Entry No. 255) and the motion for summary judgment of Defendants James Stinson and Gregory Washburn (Docket Entry No. 258) be GRANTED and that the claims against them be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because there are no other claims remaining, the consolidated actions should be DISMISSED in their entirety. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/31/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
December 2, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: Hence the R & R, (Docket No. 281), is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED and Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment, (Docket Nos. 255, 258), are GRANTED. The consolidated actions are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is directed to close the files. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 12/2/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)