Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-520 - Hosse v. Sumner County Board of Education et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-520 - Hosse v. Sumner County Board of Education et al
April 1, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/1/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
January 21, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: Jury Trial set for 3/1/2016 at 9:00 AM before Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Pretrial Conference reset for 2/12/2016 at 1:30 PM before Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Exhibit List and Witness List due by 2/9/2016. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 2/9/2016. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/21/16. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
April 13, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: We grant Defendant's motion concerning evidence of emotional damages, (See Dkt. No. 83), and Defendant's motion concerning other incidents of discrimination against the Board (See Dkt. No. 85). We deny Defendant's motion to exclude testimony concerning Plaintiff's role as Chief Negotiator, (See Dkt. No. 86), and Defendant's motion to exclude "stray remarks" concerning other employees' perception of workplace age discrimination (See Dkt. No. 87). As to Defendant's second motion, we grant the motion as to Ms. Wheeler's lay opinions but deny the motion as to statements made by other employees to Ms. Wheeler. (See Dkt. No. 84). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Marvin E. Aspen on 4/13/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
March 19, 2018
PDF | More
t Nos. 12, 15-16, 18, 25, and 35, and we defer ruling on Proposed Exhibit No. 23. (Id.) In addition, we overrule Plaintiff's objections to Defendant's Proposed Exhibit No. 13. (Dkt. No. 135.) As set forth above, these rulings shall not be reargued, absent new facts or issues not presented by the parties and addressed in this opinion. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Marvin E. Aspen on 3/19/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) Modified on 3/19/2018 (afs). Modified on 3/19/2018 (afs).MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, we sustain Defendant's objections to Plaintiff's Proposed Exhibit Nos. 14 and 78. (Dkt. No. 134.) We overrule Defendant's objections to Plaintiff's Proposed Exhibi