Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1314 - Dowell v. Department of the Army et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1314 - Dowell v. Department of the Army et al
June 3, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Accordingly, the court respectfully RECOMMENDS that: 1) the Defendant's motion for partial dismissal (Docket Entry No. 18) be DENIED; and 2) the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 27) be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to being re-filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/3/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
July 6, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 36 is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' Motion For Partial Dismissal 18 is DENIED, and the plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment 27 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to be refiled at a later stage of this case. This case shall be returned to the Magistrate Judge for further handling under the original referral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/6/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
February 14, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, the undersigned Magistrate Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that: 1. the motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 115) of Plaintiff Debbie Dowell be DENIED; 2. the motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 125) of Defendant Acting Secretary of the Army be GRANTED; and 3. this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in favor of Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 2/14/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
March 23, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/23/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
March 24, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 151) to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. No. 148) are OVERRULED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART, and the R&R is ACCEPTED IN PART AND REJECTED IN PART. The plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 115) is DENIED, and the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 125) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the court finds that the material factual disputes preclude summary judgment in the defendants favor on the plaintiff's claim that the defendant discriminated against her based upon her race and retaliated against her for filing an EEO charge when it terminated a pending noncompetitive accretion of duties promotion initiated by the plaintiff's supervisor. The plaintiff's other claims, however, are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/23/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(jw)