Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1463 - Bryant v. Forrest et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1463 - Bryant v. Forrest et al
August 5, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 8/5/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
September 8, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS for the reasons explained above that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 44) be DENIED as to defendants Forrest and Hernandez, that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 44) be GRANTED as to defendant Keys, and that the complaint against defendant Keys be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 9/8/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
September 30, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 44) is DENIED as to Defendants Forrest and Hernandez, but is GRANTED as to Defendant Keys. The claims against Defendant Keys are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 9/30/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
January 18, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the motion be denied as it appears that there are factual disputes, which must be resolved by a jury. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 1/18/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
February 9, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation 125, the objections and conducted a de novo review of the record. For the following reasons, the objections are OVERRULED, and the Report and Recommendation 125 is ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 107 is DENIED. This case will proceed to trial on May 16, 2017, and all deadlines in the Court's prior Order remain in effect 87. This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to appoint counsel for Plaintiff and to discuss alternative dispute resolution opportunities with the parties. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 2/9/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)