Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1555 - Russell et al v. Richardson et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1555 - Russell et al v. Richardson et al
January 26, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment 10 and 67; Defendant Richardson's Motions to Dismiss 15; 18; and 24); and Defendant Mitchell's Motion to both "Amend Defendants Answer and Ask for a Full Dismissal with Full Prejudice" and "Exercise my Rights to Countersue Plaintiff" 46 be DENIED without prejudice for failure to comply with the Rules and Court Orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 1/27/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
February 19, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 72is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the following motions 10, 15, 18, 24, 46 and 67 are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/19/15. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
December 29, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER rejecting 104 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the reasons expressed herein, the Report and Recommendation is REJECTED, and this case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/29/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
June 8, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the motion to dismiss this suit (Docket Entry 131) be DENIED; that the motion for relief from the order denying sanctions (Docket Entry 135) be DENIED; and that the Plaintiffs motion to correct his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry 144) be GRANTED insofar as the application may be amended but be DENIED insofar as the Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. Should this Report and Recommendation be adopted, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Plaintiff be DIRECTED to pay the $400.00 filing fee and $16.00 for service of process or face dismissal of his suit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/8/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
August 12, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court hereby ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation 152 and makes it the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant Richardson's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 131) is DENIED and defendant Richardson's Motion for Relief From Order (Docket No. 135) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Correct Application for Leave to Proceed In forma Pauperis (Docket No. 144) is GRANTED, in so far as the application may be amended, but it is DENIED in so far as the plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. This case shall be returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/11/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) Modified text on 8/12/2016 (hb).