Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-625 - Reeners v. Troup et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-625 - Reeners v. Troup et al
July 10, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint. For the reasons set forth herein, the Magistrate Judge finds that the plaintiff states colorable claims under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 and state law against defendants Ricky Troup, Donald Bandy, Lamar Ballard, "John Doe," City of Gallatin, and Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute, and supplemental state-law claims against defendant Sumner County Medical Center. A separate order will enter regarding service of process against these defendants. The Magistrate Judge further FINDS, however, that the allegations in the complaint fail to state a colorable claim against defendant Volunteer Behavioral Health Services and therefore RECOMMENDS that the claims against this defendant be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/10/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
December 7, 2015
PDF | More
istrict Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/7/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On July 10, 2015, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 7) to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case shall proceed against defendants Ricky Troup, Donald Bandy, Lamar Ballard, "John Doe", City of Gallatin, Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute, and Volunteer Behavior Health Care Services. The case shall not proceed as to Sumner County Medical Center, against whom all claims have been dismissed with prejudice by agreement (Docket No 59). Signed by D
September 7, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER re pending motions 121,129, 131 and 134. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(Brown, Joe)
August 11, 2017
PDF | More
common law by prolonging Plaintiff's stay at MTMHI. The Magistrate Judge further RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED as to all other remaining defendants and claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/11/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Brown RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 121 be GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims in Counts IV and V that Defendant Bandy violated the Fourth Amendment and Tennessee State
May 1, 2018
PDF | More
TED as to counts IV and V that Defendant Bandy violated the Fourth Amendment and Tennessee state common law by prolonging Reeners' stay at MTMHI, but DENIED as to all other remaining defendants and claims. This case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further handling under the original referral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/1/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) Modified on 5/2/2018 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation 177 in its entirety as this court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 121 is GRAN(dt).