Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1141 - Hammonds v. W.C. Jail Medical Staff et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1141 - Hammonds v. W.C. Jail Medical Staff et al
January 8, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/8/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
August 8, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the complaint against Kevin Boyd be dismissed with prejudice and that any appeal from such an order not be certified as taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/8/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
August 30, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On August 8, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 57), to which no timely objections have been filed1. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Kevin Boyd (Docket No. 28) is GRANTED, and all claims in this action against defendant Boyd are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Any appeal from this Order would notbe certifie d as taken in good faith. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/29/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)
September 2, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that t he W.C. Jail Medical Staff be dismissed from this case with prejudice and that any appeal from such an order not be certified as taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 9/2/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
November 29, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the pending motion to dismiss as to all Defendants (Docket Entry 79) be granted and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge further recommends that any appeal from the final judgment in this matter not be certified as taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 11/29/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
March 1, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on September 2, 2016 (Docket No. 77), to which the pro se plaintiff has filed an objection document (Docket No. 83). The plaintiff simply addresses the relief that he seeks in the lawsuit and makes no specific objection to the ruling made by the magistrate judge. The objection in therefore OVERRULED, and the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the "W.C. Jail Medical Staff" are dismissed as defendants in this lawsuit. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/1/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh) Modified on 3/2/2017 (eh).
March 1, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On November 29, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 84), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Handy, Resenbalm, Barnett, Leonard, Kish, Corriveau, and Sidberry (Docket No. 79) is GRANTED, and all claims against these defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. No claims remaining in this case, the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Any appeal from this dismissal will not be certified as taken in good faith. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/1/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh) Modified on 3/2/2017 (eh).