Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-196 - USA v. Oakes


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-196 - USA v. Oakes
September 10, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting 1 Motion by Govt to Seal Complaint and Arrest Warrant as to Mitchell Oakes. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 9/10/2016. (as)[3:16-mj-02107]
January 9, 2017
PDF | More
PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY as to Mitchell Hunter Oakes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 1/9/2017. (as)
May 25, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Mitchell Hunter Oakes: Sealed Motion in Limine 120 is denied without prejudice. Second Motion to Dismiss Count Four of the Indictment 113 is denied. The Court FINDS that the period of delay occasioned by the pendency of the motions to suppress (Doc. Nos. 111 and 116) is reasonable and excludable under the Speedy Trial Act. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/25/18. (jb)
July 31, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Mitchell Hunter Oakes: Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 160) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/31/2018. (eh) (Main Document 253 replaced on 8/1/2018) (eh).
August 1, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER as to Mitchell Hunter Oakes. To timely assist the Court in preparing for the pre-trial conference, the parties shall submit agreed jury instructions and an agreed verdict form by noon on August 2, 2018. The parties should consult the Court's Order dated June 27, 2018 (Doc. No. 173) for the protocol for these submissions. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/1/2018.(vk) Modified on 8/1/2018 (vk).
August 24, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: The pending Motions (Docket Nos. 333, 341) are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as summarized above. By August 27, 2018, at 9:00 p.m., the parties shall: A. File briefs regarding the proposed testimony of Jason Rogers and Howard Upchurch. Among other things, the Court is concerned about (1) the extent to which Mr. Rogers will specifically testify about alleged efforts to steal Defendant's belongings rather than generally testify about Ms. Oakes' character and his affair with her, and (2) the potential impact of the Government's desire to cross-examine Mr. Upchurch with details of Defendant's prior convictions, which have been carefully kept from the jury by means of stipulation. B. Meet and confer and file a joint statement regarding the (1) aiding and abetting jury instruction and (2) the alibi jury instruction. The parties shall specifically address the apparent tension between the former's implication that Defendant need not have been present at the scene and the latter's apparent requirement that if the Defendant was not present he cannot be found guilty. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/24/18. (af)