Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-212 - Sheridan v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-212 - Sheridan v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
July 25, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pending before the Court is Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Docket Entry 30). For the reasons explained below, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that: 1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED; 2) Defendant's request for attorney's fees be DENIED; 3) this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 4) acceptance and adoption of this Report and Recommendation constitute the FINAL JUDGMENT in this action; and 5) any appeal NOT BE CERTIFIED as taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/25/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
September 12, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: For the reasons expressed herein, the plaintiffs Objections are hereby OVERRULED and the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein and herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 30 is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The defendant shall recover no fees and costs. This Order constitutes the final judgment in this case, and any appeal would not be certified as taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/12/16. (xc:Pro se party by email.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) Modified on 9/13/2016 (dt).