Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-2470 - Hodge v. Corrections Corporation of America et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-2470 - Hodge v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
October 31, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction (Docket Entry Nos. 9, 13, and 15) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/31/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
November 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On October 31, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 30), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motions for a Preliminary Injunction (Docket Nos. 9, 13, 15) are DENIED. This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/22/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh) Modified on 11/23/2016 (eh).
January 25, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned Magistrate Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction (Docket Entry Nos. 46 and 47) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 1/25/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
February 6, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Docket Entry No. 56) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 2/6/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
April 19, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Having conducted a de novo review of the plaintiff's Motion, and in the absence of any objection from the plaintiff, the Court finds that the plaintiff has shown no compelling reason for this relief. The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court. For the reasons expressed therein, the plaintiff's Motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Docket Entry No. 56) is hereby DENIED. This case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further handling under the original referral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/19/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
July 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The court OVERRULES the Objections (Doc. No. 67) and DENIES the motions for injunctive relief (Doc. Nos. 46, 47). The matter remains referred to the magistrate judge. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/21/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
September 6, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Holmes respectfully RECOMMENDS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment 68 be GRANTED and that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all Defendants and claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 9/6/17.(xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 10, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: The plaintiff's "Respon[se] to Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes Recommendation" 94 (construed as objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation 92) is OVERRULED, and the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 68 is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 93 and Motion for Court Order 97, are DENIED AS MOOT and without prejudice to the plaintiff's ability to assert the unrelated new claims in an entirely new action. This is the final Order in this action, for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/10/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)