Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-746 - Crockett v. Core Civic et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-746 - Crockett v. Core Civic et al
September 5, 2017
PDF | More
plaintiff a service packet (a blank summons and USM 285 form) for Defendant Davis. The plaintiff MUST complete the service packets and return them to the Clerk's Office within 21 days of the date of this order. Upon return of the completed service packet, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/5/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. )(Pro se party sent (1) service packet by regular mail.) (Administrator of Davidson County Detention Facility sent copy of by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) Modified Text on 9/7/2017 (am).MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT & ORDER Assessing Filing Fee for Corey Crockett $350, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. Because it appears from the plaintiff's submissions that he lacks sufficient financial resources from which to pay the full filing fee in advance, the court GRANTS his motion (ECF No. 2) to proceed IFP in this matter. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to the administrator of the Metro- Davidson County Detention Facility to ensure that the custodian of the plaintiff's inmate trust account complies with the portion of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 pertaining to payment of the filing fee. With the exception of the claim against Defendant Davis for excessive force, all defendants and claims set forth in the plaintiff's complaint are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to send the
March 8, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: On February 16, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 13), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/8/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (am)