Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

18-018 - King v. Mays

Download Files


Document in Context
18-018 - King v. Mays
June 5, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Court will construe Petitioner's IFP application as a declaration in support of his Motion for the Appointment of Counsel. (See id. at 3 (citing "Accompanying Affidavit" as proof of inability to afford counsel).) The Clerk is therefore DIRECTED to terminate the IFP application (Doc. No. 17) as a pending motion. Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED without prejudice to refile if changed circumstances warrant revisiting the issue in the future. Finally, on May 30, 2018, Petitioner filed a motion for a thirty-day enlargement of time to file his reply to Respondent's answer. (Doc. No. 19.) The Court finds this motion to be well taken, and it is therefore GRANTED. As requested, Petitioner shall have until June 25, 2018 to file a reply to Respondent's answer. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 6/5/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)