Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-220 - Albarado et al v. City of Abilene et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-220 - Albarado et al v. City of Abilene et al
January 21, 2016
PDF | More
Report and Recommendation re: 1 Complaint filed by Juan Victor Albarado, Anita Lou Guajardo and Juan Manuel Albarado. It is RECOMMENDED that all claims of Plaintiffs Anita Lou Guajardo and Juan Victor Albarado in this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Scott Frost on 1/21/2016) (mmg)
February 17, 2016
PDF | More
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 14 Findings and Recommendations on re: 1 Complaint filed by Juan Victor Albarado, Anita Lou Guajardo, Juan Manuel Albarado. Plaintiffs Anita Lou Guajardo and Juan Victor Albarado claims are dismissed. Pursuant to Special Order 3, this case remains referred to Magistrate Judge E. Scott Frost for screening. (Ordered by Chief Judge Jorge A Solis on 2/17/2016) (mje) Modified on 2/19/2016 (mje).
March 18, 2016
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations re: 1 Complaint and 16 Motion for Leave to File filed by Juan Manuel Albarado. All Plaintiffs claims should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE until the Heck v. Humphrey conditions are met, under authority of 28 USC §1915A(b)(1) and 28 USC §1915(e)(2)(B)(I) and (ii). This dismissal will count as a "strike" or "prior occasion" within themeaning 28 USC §1915(g). Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend should be denied. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Scott Frost on 3/18/2016) (mmg)
April 19, 2016
PDF | More
Order Accepting 18 Findings and Recommendations re: 1 Complaint filed by Juan Victor Albarado, Anita Lou Guajardo and Juan Manuel Albarado. It is ORDERED that the motion for jury trial 19 and the motion for bench warrant 20 are DENIED. It if further ORDERED that the Motion for leave to amend 16 is DENIED and all Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This dismissal counts as a "strike" or "prior occasion" within the meaning 28 USC §1915(g). (Ordered by Chief Judge Jorge A Solis on 4/19/2016) (mmg)