Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-1432 - Mooney v. Dallas County et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-1432 - Mooney v. Dallas County et al
December 4, 2007
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is recommended that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Doc. #68 and #72) be GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment (Doc. #75) be DENIED. It is further recommended that Plaintiff's motion to amend (Doc. #65) be DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff's filing a complaint in the Eastern District of Texas, where he is presently confined, in the event he has yet to receive hernia repair and colostomy reversal surgeries. Plaintiff's motions to appoint counsel and to produce documents (Doc. #66, #74, and #86) should be DENIED. (Signed by Judge Wm F Sanderson Jr on 12/4/2007) (mfw)
January 14, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 92 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Signed by Judge David C Godbey on 1/14/2008) (mfw)