Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-2487 - Encompass Office Solutions, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-2487 - Encompass Office Solutions, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company et al
July 25, 2012
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss: Specifically, the court concludes that Encompass has standing to pursue claims to recover medical benefits but not other claims. Further, the court concludes that Encompass has stated state law claims for breach of contract and quantum meruit to the extent they are based on non-ERISA governed plans; however, Encompass's quantum meruit claim that is dependent on alleged ERISA plan terms is completely preempted under ERISA and dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/25/2012) (twd)
March 25, 2013
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 35 Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Encompass Office Solutions, Inc. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/25/2013) (aaa)
July 31, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Granted in part, Denied in part and Rules as Moot (please see order for specifics). Plaintiff's claims for benefits under ERISA are remanded to Defendants' plan administrator for further adjudication consistent with this opinion for a period of 180 days. During this interim period, the court administratively closes the case for statistical purposes. The court's decision to administratively close the case while Defendants further consider Plaintiff's ERISA claims is not a dismissal or disposition of the parties' remaining claims under ERISA or this case, and does not affect the court's jurisdiction over this action. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/31/2017) (ndt)