Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-2013 - Davis v. Valdez


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-2013 - Davis v. Valdez
August 20, 2012
PDF | More
Findings and Recommendations on Case. Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan no longer assigned to case. Plaintiff's claims against Dallas County Sheriff Lupe Valdez should be summarily dismissed. His excessive force claims against two unnamed detention officers should proceed. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan on 8/20/2012) (mcrd)
September 6, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER Accepting 13 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court dismisses with prejudice the claims against Sheriff Lupe Valdez. This case is recommited to the magistrate judge for additional screening of Plaintiff's excessive force claim against the two unnamed detention officers. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/6/2012) (tla)
November 1, 2013
PDF | More
Findings and Recommendations on Motion. The undersigned recommends that Defendants' 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment on the Issues of Exhaustion and Qualified Immunity be granted and Plaintiff's case be dismissed. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 11/1/2013) (mcrd)
November 25, 2013
PDF | More
Order Accepting 60 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 45 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Cody Hill, F Hernandez. The court grants Defendants Hernandez and Hill's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issues of Exhaustion and Qualified Immunity 45 and dismisses with prejudice this action and the claims against Defendants Fernando Hernandez and Cody Hill. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 11/25/2013) (cea)
February 6, 2014
PDF | More
Findings and Recommendations on Motion: The Court should grant Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal and allow Plaintiff a 30-day extension of time in which to file his notice of appeal, which would make his Notice of Appeal signed on January 2, 2014 and docketed on January 9, 2014 timely under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(a). (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 2/6/2014) (mcrd)
February 21, 2014
PDF | More
Order Accepting the 67 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, granting Plaintiff a thirty-day extension of time to appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a), and deems as timely his notice of appeal, filed on 1/9/2014. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/21/2014) (tln)
January 5, 2016
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should revoke Davis's IFP status and sua sponte dismiss this action w/out prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b). If, however, within 14 days of the date of this recommendation, Davis contacts the Court, the Court should refer this action back to the undersigned for further consideration. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 1/5/2016) (mcrd)
January 27, 2016
PDF | More
Order Accepting 90 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The court, therefore, revokes Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Hernandez and Hill pursuant to FRCvP 41(b) for failure to prosecute and comply with court orders. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/27/2016) (twd)