Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-2699 - Lott v. Davis, Director TDCJ-CID


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-2699 - Lott v. Davis, Director TDCJ-CID
June 12, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION REGARDING VENUE. It is ordered that this case should be transferred to the Dallas Division of the USDC N/D Tx. A Transfer Order shall be entered in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 6/12/13. (mrp, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 7/12/2013.]
May 5, 2015
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: The petition for habeas corpus relief should be DENIED with prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 5/5/2015) (mcrd)
June 23, 2015
PDF | More
Order Accepting 19 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability. (Ordered by Chief Judge Jorge A Solis on 6/23/2015) (ykp)
July 15, 2015
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (doc. 26) should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/15/2015) (mcrd)
August 18, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING JULY 15, 2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, and ORDER DENYING POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS: For the foregoing reasons, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation (doc. 27) and DENIES petitioner Rheashad Lamar Lott's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (doc. 26); his Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b) for Lack of Jurisdiction, Improper Venue, Insufficient Service of Process or Failure to State a Claim under Rule 12(h)(3) (doc. 28); his Motion to Set Aside the Findings of Fact and Conclusions by the Court Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 52 (doc. 29); the Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 60(b) (doc. 30); and the Motion/Application for Certificate of Appealability (doc. 31). (Ordered by Chief Judge Jorge A Solis on 8/18/2015) (tln)
July 27, 2017
PDF | More
RANSFERRED to the court of appeals. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/27/2017) (mcrd) Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations re: the petitioner's 38 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion should be construed as a successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, opened as a new case, and T
August 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 42 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/21/2017) (ykp)
March 30, 2018
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the petitioner's 46 Motion for Leave of Court to File Motion for Relief of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) and Offer of Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 68. Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the post-judgment filings should be construed as a successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, opened as a new case, and TRANSFERRED to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 3/30/2018) (mcrd)
April 20, 2018
PDF | More
Order Accepting 48 Findings and Recommendations. The petition for habeas corpus (docs. 46, 47) is successive and is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to open a new habeas case for administrative purposes only; docket the post-judgment filings (docs. 46, 47) as a § 2254 motion filed on March 28, 2018. (New habeas case no. 3:18-cv-999-N) (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/20/2018) (ndt)