Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-432 - Hatcher et al v. City of Grand Prairie et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-432 - Hatcher et al v. City of Grand Prairie et al
July 15, 2014
PDF | More
Findings and Recommendations on Case: Defendant Bement's 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim should be denied, and his Request for a Rule 7(a) Reply to Immunity Defense should be granted. Defendant City of Grand Prairie's 8 MOTION to Dismiss should be granted in part with prejudice and granted in part without prejudice. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 7/15/2014) (mcrd)
August 6, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER accepting 21 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court Denies Defendant Wesley Bement's Rule 12(b)(6) 9 Motion to Dismiss and Grants his Request for a Rule 7(a) Reply to Immunity Defense. The Court Grants Defendant City of Grand Prairie's 8 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs must, within 21 days from the date of this Order, file an amended complaint addressing the pleading deficiencies in their municipal liability claims. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/6/2014) (skt)
December 15, 2014
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant Wesley Bement's 28 Second Motion to Dismiss should be denied. The City of Grand Prairie's 27 Second Motion to Dismiss should be granted with prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 12/15/2014) (twd)
January 14, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 36 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/14/2015) (skt)
April 3, 2015
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part 44 MOTION for Leave to Conduct Discovery. The next step is for counsel for the parties to confer in person or by telephone no later than 4/13/2015 to discuss the Plaintiffs' proposed discovery in light of this order. The parties shall then submit a joint status report by 4/17/2015. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 4/3/2015) (jrr)
December 14, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CONSTRUED FED. R. CIV. P. 56(E)(1) REQUEST: To the extent that Plaintiffs believe that material facts that they assert in opposition to the summary judgment motion are not properly supported or presented to the Court in a proper form, the Court, pursuant to Rule 56(e)(1), GRANTS Plaintiffs until December 28, 2015 to file a supplemental response to the summary judgment motion, and Defendant may file a supplemental reply no later than January 11, 2016. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 12/14/2015) (mcrd)
February 2, 2016
PDF | More
Findings and Recommendations on Motions: The Court should deny Defendant's 60 MOTION for Summary Judgment, grant Plaintiff's 68 MOTION to Amend/Correct Plaintiffs' Complaint, and direct the Clerk of Court to docket Dkt. No. 68-1 as the second amended complaint. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 2/2/2016) (mcrd)
March 24, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER accepting in part the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge re 81 Findings and Recommendations on Case; denying 60 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 68 Motion to Amend/Correct. (Unless the document has already been filed, clerk to enter the document as of the date of this order.) (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/24/2016) (mem)