Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1894 - Hunter v. Watkins et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1894 - Hunter v. Watkins et al
January 22, 2015
PDF | More
der that the case may be reopened upon motion of the Plaintiff filed after the pending criminal charges are no longer pending. Any such motion should be filed within the statutory period of limitations for Plaintiff's claims, or within sixty days of the date the criminal charges are no longer pending, whichever date is later. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/22/2015) (mcrd) Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Plaintiff's claims against the DA, ADA, and against the Complainant and Witnesses for lying under oath, should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). His remaining claims against the Officer, the Complainant and the Witnesses should be STAYED. The Clerk of the Court should be DIRECTED to mark this action CLOSED for statistical purposes. The Court should retain jurisdiction and or
February 6, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND STAYING PART OF CASE: Plaintiff's remaining claims against Officer O. Hampton and Tameka Austin, LaSheawn Rose, Damirus Cooks, and Victor Kelly are STAYED. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this action CLOSED for statistical purposes. The Court retains jurisdiction over these claims and orders that the case may be reopened on motion of Plaintiff to pursue them after the pending state criminal charges are resolved. Any motion to reopen the case to pursue these claims must be filed within the statutory period of limitations for Plaintiffs claims, or within sixty days of the date the criminal charges are resolved, whichever date is later. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/6/2015) (twd)
July 6, 2016
PDF | More
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 22 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 9 Amended Complaint; denying 34 Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, denying 35 Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/6/2016) (mem)