Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-3420 - Reagan v. USA


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-3420 - Reagan v. USA
May 2, 2016
PDF | More
l D Stickney on 5/2/2016) (mcrd) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This cause of action was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b), as implemented by an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The Court recommends that the motion to correct, vacate or set aside sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be denied. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Pau
May 25, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 87 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY: In the event the petitioner files a notice of appeal, the court notes that the petitioner will need to pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 5/25/2016) (sss)
August 1, 2017
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This cause of action was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b), as implemented by an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The Court recommends that the Rule 60(b) motion be construed as a successive § 2255 petition and that the petition be TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pursuant to In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997). (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 8/1/2017) (mcrd)
August 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The 138 motion for relief from judgment filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) is construed as a successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and the petition is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Clerk's Office is directed to open a new civil action, nature of suit 530, and terminate the Rule 60(b) motion in this case. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/21/2017) (sss)
January 9, 2018
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This cause of action was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b), as implemented by an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The Court recommends that the Rule 33 motion be construed as a successive § 2255 petition and that the petition be TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pursuant to In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5'h Cir. 1997). (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 1/9/2018) (mcrd)
April 20, 2018
PDF | More
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1631.1 The Clerk's Office is directed to open a new civil action, nature of suit 530, with direct assignment to Chief Judge Lynn and Magistrate Judge Rutherford and terminate the motion in this case. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/20/2018) (ran) (New civil case opened as 3:18-cv-01007-M)ORDER accepting 153 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the 149 Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for new trial is construed as filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of