Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-3852 - Pittman et al v. Seterus Inc et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-3852 - Pittman et al v. Seterus Inc et al
March 2, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Plaintiffs Craig and Kelly Pittman, who are proceeding pro se, have filed an "Objection to Notice of Removal to Federal Court," which the court construes as a motion to remand. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs' objection is overruled and their 15 Motion to remand is DENIED. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 3/2/2015) (mcrd) Modified document type and text on 3/3/2015 (skt).
March 2, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 21 Motion for Default Judgment. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 3/2/2015) (mcrd) Modified document type on 3/4/2015 (ykp).
April 6, 2015
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: In view of the filing of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, the court recommends that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 12 be DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 4/6/2015) (aaa) Modified on 4/22/2015 (gr).
May 6, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 32 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney dated 4/6/2015. The Court reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) is DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 5/6/2015) (bdb)
October 28, 2015
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The District Court referred this removed civil action, arising out of foreclosure proceedings initiated against certain real property located in Dallas, Texas, to the United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial management pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and a Standing Order of Reference. The District Court should GRANT Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E. 51]. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 10/28/2015) (mcrd) (mcrd).
November 23, 2015
PDF | More
Order Accepting 58 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants'/Counter-Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E. 51] is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 11/23/2015) (axm)
January 8, 2016
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The District Court referred this removed civil action, arising out of foreclosure proceedings initiated against certain real property located in Dallas, Texas, to the United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial management pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The District Court should GRANT Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Motion to Modify Judgment [D.E. 61]. Further, the District Court should GRANT Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs summary judgment motion for judicial foreclosure [D.E. 51]. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 1/8/2016) (mcrd)
January 19, 2016
PDF | More
AMENDED JUDGMENT: It has come to the Court's attention that the original Judgment entered in this case [Docket Entry #60] failed to specifically address the Counterclaim for judicial foreclosure filed by Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"). Because Fannie Mae is entitled to proceed with the relief requested in its Counterclaim, the Court enters this Amended Judgment. Fannie Mae's Motion to Modify Judgment [Docket Entry #61], and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge directed to the Motion [Docket Entry #62], are DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/19/2016) (sss)
February 18, 2016
PDF | More
Findings and Recommendations re: 68 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: The party appealing should be DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 2/18/2016) (sss)
May 9, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL denying 68 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis re 66 Notice of Appeal. The court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 5/9/2016) (ykp)