Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-4338 - Ream v. City of Heath et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-4338 - Ream v. City of Heath et al
June 2, 2015
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Defendant the City of Heath ("the City") has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's original complaint in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The District Court should GRANT the City's Rule 12(b)(6) motion (Doc. 11) and DISMISS Ream's claims against the City without prejudice. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 6/2/2015) (mcrd)
June 2, 2015
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Defendant Terry Garrett has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's original complaint in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The District Court should DENY without prejudice Defendant Garrett's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss (Doc. 15) and order Ream to respond to Garrett's immunity defense by filing a Rule 7(a) reply or an amended complaint. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 6/2/2015) (mcrd)
June 2, 2015
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Defendant Lorne Liechty has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's original complaint in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The District Court should GRANT Defendant Liechty's Rule 12(b)(6) motion (Doc. 13). The Court should allow Ream leave to file an amended complaint to address the deficiencies identified by the defendants and should further order Ream to respond to Liechty's immunity defenses in her amended complaint or by filing a Rule 7(a) reply. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 6/2/2015) (mcrd)
July 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 29 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The City of Heath's ("the City") 11 Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against the City are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/16/2015) (axm)
July 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 30 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant Garrett's 15 Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 15) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff is ORDERED to respond to Garrett's immunity defense by filing an amended complaint by 8/28/2015. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/16/2015) (axm)
July 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 31 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant Liechty's Rule 12(b)(6) 13 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to file an amended complaint to address the deficiencies identified by the Defendants in their motions to dismiss. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to respond to Liechty's immunity defenses in her amended complaint by 8/28/2015. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/16/2015) (axm)
December 7, 2015
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Before the Court are Defendant Liechty's Second 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 45] and Defendant Garrett's Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment [D.E. 47]. These motions were referred by the District Court to the Magistrate Judge for recommendation according to 12 U.S.C. § 636(b). The Court recommends that Defendant Liechty's Second 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 45] be granted and Ream's claim against him be dismissed with prejudice. The Court further recommends that Defendant Garrett's Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment [D.E. 47] be denied. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 12/7/2015) (mcrd)
January 14, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court has under consideration the 58 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. Objections were filed. The District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed 58 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Liechty's Second 12(b)(6)45 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Defendant Garretts Rule 12(c) 47 Motion for Judgment is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/14/2016) (ran)